In response to the denied Motion for Partial Summary Judgement, class member Lawyers filed a Motion for Reconsideration on Partial Summary Judgement along with 4 other documents detailed below.
The Motion for Reconsideration on Partial Summary Judgement argues:
- A. Pursuant to CR56(d), the Court Should Rule on the Undisputed Facts.
- B. The Court Should Define the Homestead PRD Common Open Space.
- C. The Court Should Define the Scope of Work Included in Maintenance.
- D. The Court Should Rule That the Plan of Development Is Set Forth in the Declaration.
- E. The Court Should Rule That the Homeowners Have Not Failed to Establish the Association.
- F. The Court Should Rule That 18 Paradise and MJ Management Intended to Delegate All Declarant Rights to MJ Management Along With Discretion to Exercise Them.
Read the 13 page Motion for Reconsideration on Partial Summary Judgement below and/or click on the respective link to read all the filed documents.
Note: Documents may be slow to load. Hover mouse over document to zoom in/out and to proceed to next page.
- Motion for Reconsideration on Partial Summary Judgment
- Declaration of Matthew Davis in Support of Reconsideration on Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
- [Proposed] Order Granting Revision of Court’s Order on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Redline)
- [Proposed] Order Granting Revision of Court’s Order on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Clean)
- Note for Motion Docket
2021.02.11 Motion for Reconsideration on Partial Summary Judgement